| 23-6706 |
Ohio, ex rel. Lonnie Rarden v. Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Butler County, et al. |
Ohio |
2024-02-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure faretta-v-california fundamental-error johnson-v-zerbst law-of-the-case res-judicata right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court-jurisdiction waiver-of-counsel |
Does this Court no longer recognize the right to counsel under Johnson v. Zerbst? |
| 23-5857 |
Jeremy Moody v. Georgia |
Georgia |
2023-10-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
autonomy-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-strategy due-process faretta-v-california guilty-plea mccoy-v-louisiana right-to-control-defense right-to-self-representation self-representation trial-court-discretion |
Whether a guilty plea waives claims that the trial court violated a defendant's autonomy-based rights |
| 22-6903 |
William Landry, Jr. v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2023-03-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-interpretation constitutional-rights due-process faretta-v-california fourteenth-amendment indigent-defense sixth-amendment speedy-trial state-constitution statutory-interpretation |
Whether Oklahoma's State Constitution Article II ยง 20 violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments by failing to contain the language of the Speedy Tr… |
| 22-6276 |
Lester S. Barney v. Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-12-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254d faretta-right faretta-v-california habeas-corpus habeas-review ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review pro-se-representation self-representation strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether the state court unreasonably determined that Lester S. Barney did not clearly and unequivocally assert his right to proceed pro se |
| 21-8027 |
Derek J. DeGroot v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2022-06-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
competency conflict-of-counsel counsel-conflict faretta-colloquy faretta-v-california pro-se-representation self-representation sixth-amendment timeliness trial-court-discretion |
Does the Sixth Amendment require a trial court to conduct a competency colloquy where a defendant makes a mid-trial demand to represent himself? |
| 21-7904 |
Vladimir Duarte v. New York |
New York |
2022-05-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process faretta-standard faretta-v-california self-representation sincerity sixth-amendment unequivocal-request waiver-of-counsel |
Whether a court must assess only the plain language of a defendant's self-representation request or also determine whether the defendant sincerely des… |
| 21-7844 |
James R. W. Mitchell v. Raymond Madden, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
counsel-appointment court-discretion criminal-defendant criminal-procedure faretta-right faretta-v-california mccoy-v-louisiana right-to-counsel right-to-self-representation self-representation sixth-amendment |
Whether the state court unreasonably applied Faretta v. California by reading a timeliness requirement into the right to self-representation |
| 21-7724 |
Anthony Fields v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2022-04-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment court-of-appeals evidence-suppression Faretta-v-California fourth-amendment Koon-v-United-States legal-error precedent-interpretation self-representation traffic-stop |
Whether the court of appeals' decision affirming the denial of Petitioner's request to exercise his right to self-representation while ignoring comple… |
| 21-871 |
Louisiana v. David H. Brown |
Louisiana |
2021-12-13 |
Denied |
|
capital-case death-penalty faretta-right faretta-v-california mccoy-v-louisiana self-representation structural-error trial-counsel |
Whether the Louisiana Supreme Court erred in vacating the three death sentences |
| 21-6556 |
Richard Bernard Grundy, III v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-12-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california fifth-amendment judicial-discretion self-representation sixth-amendment |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the District Court deprived Richard Grundy of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rig… |
| 21-5701 |
Michel Cherfrere v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-09-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
competency competency-examination criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california right-to-counsel self-representation speedy-trial standby-counsel |
Right-to-self-representation |
| 20-7182 |
Anton Tuomi v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-02-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure conflict-of-interest faretta-rights faretta-v-california guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel waiver-of-rights |
Whether the petitioner was denied his right to counsel |
| 20-929 |
Neil J. Gillespie v. Florida |
Florida |
2021-01-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
6th-amendment constitutional-right criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california forced-counsel habeas-corpus right-to-self-representation self-representation state-proceedings |
Can a writ of habeas corpus free a criminal defendant in state criminal proceedings from being restrained by forced appointment of counsel prohibited … |
| 20-5760 |
Daniel Carl Frederickson v. California |
California |
2020-09-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-case constitutional-rights defense-counsel faretta-v-california guilty-plea mccoy-v-louisiana plea-of-guilty self-representation sixth-amendment |
Does a state statute that requires the consent of defense counsel before a defendant in a capital case can enter a plea of guilty violate the Sixth Am… |
| 20-5327 |
Thyochus A. Huggins v. California |
California |
2020-08-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment appointment-of-counsel civil-rights due-process faretta-v-california self-representation |
Did the trial court violate Petitioner's rights under the Sixth Amendment as set forth in Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975) when it told Peti… |
| 20-5085 |
Joe Edward Johnson v. California |
California |
2020-07-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (5)IFP |
batson-challenge criminal-procedure due-process faretta-motion faretta-v-california jury-selection legal-timeliness self-representation timeliness totality-of-circumstances |
Whether a pretrial request for self-representation can be held 'untimely' |
| 19-6995 |
Richard Alan King v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-12-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california fundamental-miscarriage-of-justice magistrate pro-se-pleading procedural-default remand reversal standard-of-review standing supreme-court-precedent |
Was the presiding magistrate's analysis so flawed as to warrant this court to reverse and remand so that a correct legal standard may be applied? |
| 19-6458 |
Torrence E. Davis v. Arizona |
Arizona |
2019-10-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conditional-demand constitutional-rights criminal-procedure equivocal-invocation equivocal-request faretta-right faretta-v-california judicial-discretion new-counsel pro-per right-to-counsel self-representation self-representation-right trial-court-advisement waiver-of-counsel |
Whether a conditional request to proceed pro per is automatically equivocal |
| 19-6266 |
Willie Jones, Jr. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conflict-among-courts constitutional-law court-of-appeals criminal-procedure dilatory-conduct dilatory-purpose dilatory-purposes faretta-right faretta-v-california federal-courts self-representation sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right-to-self-representation state-courts |
Did the Ninth Circuit's disposition of Petitioner's Faretta claim conflict with Faretta v. California? |
| 18-9121 |
Jerry L. Gater v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california jury-trial-guarantee nelson-v-colorado presumption-of-innocence pro-se right-to-counsel sentencing-factors voir-dire |
Does a defendant have a right to participate in voir dire when proceeding pro se? |
| 18-8639 |
Anthony Franklin v. Patrick Nogan, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-04-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process equal-protection faretta-hearing faretta-v-california habeas-corpus pro-se-representation self-representation sixth-amendment third-circuit third-circuit-law |
Whether the district court erred in denying a Writ of Habeas Corpus to Petitioner |
| 18-1098 |
Daniel E. Witte v. Jayden H. Huynh, nka Jayden Scacco |
Utah |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment civil-litigation civil-rights constitutional-right constitutional-rights due-process faretta-v-california first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech pro-se-representation self-representation strict-scrutiny |
Is a pro se civil litigant's right of self-representation in state court protected as a fundamental federal constitutional right subject to the strict… |
| 18-7694 |
Raymond Crespo v. New York |
New York |
2019-01-31 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeal criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process faretta-v-california judicial-discretion legal-timeliness pro-se-representation right-to-counsel right-to-self-representation self-representation timeliness |
How soon in the criminal proceeding must a defendant decide between proceeding by counsel or pro se? |
| 18-7196 |
Edward Allen McElroy v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
child-pornography criminal-procedure due-process faretta-hearing faretta-v-california pro-se-representation self-representation sentencing supervised-release waiver-of-counsel |
Where a defendant is charged in federal court with possession and production of child pornography, the maximum punishment for which carries a lifetime… |
| 18-6940 |
Dalray Kwane Andrews v. Warren L. Montgomery, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure dilatory faretta-right faretta-v-california habeas-corpus self-representation sixth-amendment timeliness trial-court |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that Faretta clearly established a requirement that a request for self-representation must be made at least… |
| 18-697 |
Tony Von Carruthers v. Tony Mays, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-11-27 |
Denied |
|
argersinger-v-hamlin capital-case capital-punishment criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process faretta-v-california pro-se-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment waiver |
Does depriving a criminal defendant of trial counsel against his will, without at least the warnings and voluntary waiver required by Faretta, violate… |
| 18-6749 |
James Barnes v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-11-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-violation criminal-procedure faretta-right faretta-v-california mitigation mitigation-investigation presentencing-investigation pro-se-defendant sixth-amendment special-counsel |
Whether Florida's use of 'special counsel' to investigate and present mitigation and its requirement of a presentencing investigation report to provid… |
| 18-6417 |
Derrick Wilson v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2018-10-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
faretta-v-california faretta-waiver Fifth-Amendment-due-process Fourth-Amendment Franks-v-Delaware johnson-v-zerbst pro-se-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right United-States-v-Giordano voluntariness waiver wiretap-application |
When trial counsel informs the court that he is not prepared for trial and the court's Faretta colloquy does not inquire into the voluntariness of Pet… |
| 18-238 |
South Carolina v. Lamont Antonio Samuel |
South Carolina |
2018-08-23 |
Denied |
|
court-of-appeals criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process ethics faretta-v-california judicial-conduct judicial-discretion judicial-integrity self-representation sixth-amendment unethical-conduct |
Did the South Carolina Supreme Court err when it held โ in conflict with many federal courts of appeals โ that a trial court may not deny a criminal d… |